![]() |
(tel) 617.253.8027 (fax) 617.253.6385 |
Numerical and Analytical Modelling of Downhole Seismic Sources: The Near and Far Field
Jeffrey A. Meredith
Submitted
to the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences on October
31, 1990 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor
of Philosophy
Abstract
The
physical and mathematical description of seismic sources is well developed
in the fields of earthquake seismology. In contrast, the description of radiation
from seismic sources that have been placed in boreholes is poorly developed.
Most of the work describing downhole seismic sources has consisted of the
evaluation of integrals in the far field using the method of stationary phase.
These far field descriptions, however, fail to describe long-standing experimental
observations made in low velocity sediments surrounding fluid-filled boreholes.
In particular, the far field descriptions fail to duplicate the relative increase
in shear wave amplitude in the vertical direction for low velocity sediments.
However, the far field representations do describe radiation into high velocity
sediments fairly well.
Two approaches, one analytical and one numerical, were used in this thesis
to enhance the description of radiation from downhole seismic sources. The
numerical approach involved development of a Thomson-Haskell type algorithm
to investigate radiation from axial, torsional, radial and volume point sources.
The analytical approach was to verify, explain and most importantly extend
the far field analysis for the empty and fluid-filled borehole.
Using the analytical and numerical approaches and comparison between the two
techniques proved to be a powerful tool for the description of radiation from
downhole seismic sources. The presence of fluid in the borehole, the presence
of casing surrounding the borehole, and the velocities of the lithology surrounding
the borehole were shown to be important elements governing the observed radiation.
One exception is that in the case of axial and torsional sources, radiation
was found to be independent of borehole effects.
For radial and point sources, P wave radiation is somewhat affected by the
borehole but not significantly by the presence of fluid in the borehole. The
P wave radiation is essentially spherical with a slight perturbation along
the borehole axis. The effect of casing on the P wave radiation pattern is
limited to reducing the amplitude.
Radiation of S waves from radial and point sources was most significantly
affected by the borehole. Radiation of S waves from empty borehole and into
high velocity sediments surrounding fluid-filled boreholes was found to be
qualitively similar and well understood. Radiaition of S waves into low velocity
sediemnts surrounding boreholes was found to be controlled by the tube wave
travelling up the borehole. In fact, the tube wave generates conical wave
fronts which produce part of the radiated S wave field. This has been hypothesized
on the basis of experiemntal evidence and here the physics and mathematics
of the phenomena is thoroughly explored. It is shown that these conical wavefronts
are in fact Mach waves analagous to their counterparts in aerodynamics and
seismology. Mathematically, Mach waves are governed by a tube wave pole and
the proimity of the integration path to this pole governs the behavior of
the radiated S wave field. The dependence differs according to the velocity
range:
Calculation of the residue for the tube wave pole allows the contribution
of the Mach wave to be isolated and calculated. Through this residue calculation,
analogous to the calculation of the residue of the Rayleigh wave in seismology,
the existence of the necessary phase delays for Mach wave radiation are derived
and this phase delay was seen to be equivalent to that determined by geometric
arguments. Additionally, a geometric decay of 1/r could be derived from the
calculation of the residue, where r2 is the horizontal distance between the
source and receiver not the total distance.
Comparison of seismograms generated with the numerical algorithm and those
generated with the radiation pattern formulas showed good agreement when lithologies
with high velocities surrounded the source borehole. Comparison of the algorithm
results with two data sets from published experiments measuring radiation
from point sources (dynamite) into low velocity sediments surrounding the
borehole showed excellent agreement and helped resolve long standing differences
with the theoretical predictions. A third data set showing radiation from
a downhole axial source into a low velocity sediment also agreed with the
algorithm results quite well.